Bad Day for Ford – BC Human Rights Tribunal Finds Ford Discriminated Against Employee While On Maternity Leave
By: Michelle QuinnIn the case of LaFleche v. NLFD Auto dba Prince George Ford (No. 2), 2022 BCHRT 88, the BC Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) found that Ms. LaFleche had been discriminated against on the basis of sex and family status. She was terminated from her position while on maternity leave.
Ms. LaFleche commenced work at NLFD Auto Ltd. dba Prince George Ford (“Ford”) in 2015 as a social media manager. In December 2016, she was promoted to a new full-time position as the marketing manager by the general manager of Ford. She was the sole marketing manager. She was successful in her work and performed well.
Prior to going on maternity leave in May 2018, Ms. LaFleche hired Jessica Callahan (“Ms. Callahan”) in and around April 2018 to cover for Ms. LaFleche while she was on maternity leave. Ms. LaFleche was involved in Ms. Callahan’s hiring and training for the position.
Ms. Callahan was hired temporarily to fill the marketing manager position.
Ms. LaFleche was expected to return to work on July 2, 2019. While Ms. LaFleche was on maternity leave, Ford hired a new general manager, Chris Wall (“Mr. Wall”), who took over the supervision of the marketing manager position, and he was pleased with Ms. Callahan’s work.
On February 8, 2019, Ms. LaFleche had a meeting (the “Meeting”) with Mr. Wall and Ford’s senior controller. In that Meeting, Mr. Wall informed Ms. LaFleche that Ms. Callahan would be staying on as marketing manager and that he would get back to her by the end of March to discuss her return to work position and duties. This did not happen. Consequently, Ms. LaFleche did not return to work at the end of her maternity leave on July 2, 2019.
On February 13, 2019, Ms. LaFleche filed a complaint with the Tribunal. She alleged that Ford’s conduct was discriminatory based on sex and family status contrary to section 13 of the Human Rights Code (the “Code”).
The Issues
The issues before the Tribunal were threefold:
- Whether Ford removed Ms. LaFleche from her marketing position;
- Whether Ford’s conduct adversely affected Ms. LaFleche, including whether it constructively dismissed her; and
- Whether Ms. LaFleche’s sex and/or family status were factors in any adverse impact.
The Decision
The Tribunal found that Ford removed Ms. LaFleche from her marketing manager position and constructively dismissed her from employment which adversely affected her. The Tribunal accepted that Ms. LaFleche was humiliated in the Meeting and grieved the loss of her job.
Ford argued that Ms. Fleche’s maternity leave was not a factor in its decision to retain Ms. Callahan as the marketing manager and make changes to Ms. LaFleche’s position on her return from maternity leave. The Tribunal did not accept this argument and held:
Ford had discriminated against Ms. LaFleche on the basis of sex and family status contrary to section 13 of the Code.
If you have experienced discrimination in the workplace and need some legal advice, contact Michelle Quinn, Partner, in the Employment and Human Rights Group at mquinn@rbs.ca or call at 604.661.9229.
-
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the Canadian economy and has resulted in job loss and precarious employment across various sectors. It is yet to be seen however if and how these changes will affect an employee’s entitlement to reasonable notice following a without cause dismissal. In this article, we review recent court decisions addressing the impact of COVID-19 on wrongful dismissal damages.
-
The unprecedented circumstances around the COVID-19 pandemic have many employers looking for answers to complex questions in a hurry. As a service to our clients, here are some of the questions we have been asked most often in recent days.
